126454 ✔ 【Tested】

The Court ruled that the option contract was unenforceable due to lack of separate consideration. The payments made (P84,000) were deemed to be advance rentals , not a separate option fee, meaning no binding option contract existed. Full Text Source

Full Text and Summary of G.R. No. 126454 - Baptist vs. Ca Case 126454

Is this the legal case you were looking for, or were you referring to the or the ETSI TS 126 454 technical document ? The Court ruled that the option contract was

AI responses may include mistakes. For legal advice, consult a professional. Learn more not a separate option fee