Eye For An Eye -

Eye for an Eye: Moving from Retribution to Restoration The phrase "an eye for an eye" is one of the oldest and most misunderstood concepts in human history. While it’s often used today to justify revenge, its original purpose was actually the opposite: it was a law of and fairness . The Evolution of "Eye for an Eye"

Mahatma Gandhi famously observed, . This simple warning highlights the destructive cycle of modern revenge: Eye for an Eye

Historically known as lex talionis (the law of retaliation), the principle first appeared in ancient legal codes like the Code of Hammurabi and later in the Hebrew Bible. Eye for an Eye: Moving from Retribution to

: In its original context, it was designed to prevent escalating feuds. If someone lost a tooth, they couldn't take a life in return; the punishment had to be proportional to the crime. This simple warning highlights the destructive cycle of

: In Jewish tradition, the Talmudic interpretation shifted from literal physical punishment to monetary compensation . This ensured justice was served without descending into "barbaric" physical violence. Why Gandhi’s Warning Still Matters